Monday, December 28, 2009

Agnes Grey by Anne Bronte

Rating - 2.5: parts of it are worth reading once (borrow it from a library)

Poor Anne Bronte, condemned to the dustbin of history for the affront of saying that abusive alcoholics are poor romantic prospects rather than Byronic bad boys who just need the love of a good woman. She died young, and her sister suppressed her work. Were she alive today, teens would write web pages devoted to hating her for the review of New Moon that you know she would write.

The Nanny Diaries, 1847. Agnes Gray takes a job as a governess, first with spoiled children, later with spoiled teenagers. Those are the kinds of families that can afford to hire governesses for their children. Can she find love or happiness amidst the vapid, young gentry-to-be?

Anne Bronte wrote two books. I should have gone with the other one, because this one is not very good.

To some degree, that reflects my preferences. Much of the story is about the suffering of the innocent protagonist, subject to the whims of her employers and their children. If you enjoy books about bearing pointless cruelty, you will still find better versions elsewhere. The story is standard, the writing is unexceptional, and the characters were reportedly more sympathetic and identifiable at the time.

Teachers might recognize Anges's first job, in which she is expected to produce results from obstinate children while denied both carrots and sticks. She has nothing but persuasion, which she is reprimanded for using, and any success is undermined by the family that wonders why things are not getting better.
I returned, however, with unabashed vigour to my work -- a more arduous task than anyone can imagine, who has not felt something like the misery of being charged with the care and direction of a set of mischievous, turbulent rebels, whom his utmost exertions cannot bind to their duty, while, at the same time, he is responsible for their conduct to a higher power, who exacts from him what cannot be achieved without the aid of the superior's more potent authority, which, either from indolence, or the fear of becoming unpopular with the said rebellious gang, the latter refuses to give. I can conceive of few situations more harassing than that wherein, however you may long for success, however you may labour to fulfill your duty, your efforts are baffled and set at naught by those beneath you, and unjustly censured and misjudged by those above.
The second arc is a Cinderella story, minus the fairy godmother and plus more explicit Christian moralizing than we are used to in romance stories. Anne Bronte was the plain, unassuming daughter of a country curate, so Agnes Gray is the plain, unassuming daughter of a country parson. Agnes falls for a country curate, and her sister marries a country vicar. One suspects a limited frame of reference or scope of imagination, but "write what you know." At any rate, the romantic thoughts are tied to love of kindness, simplicity, and theological vigor. If you have ever been attracted to someone because of his/her strong views on the doctrinal differences between Anglicans and Methodists, this will be right up your alley.

To emphasize that we have a Cinderella story, her two pupils even match the standard wicked step-sisters, one haughty and vain while the other more earthy and dull, conspiring to keep her oppressed at home while they make a play for the prince. The "prince" being an ugly but morally upstanding country curate, the stakes are somewhat lower here, and the story hews closely to the fact that competition is always the most vicious when there is little to go around.

Anne Bronte is noted for the realism of her writing, rather than the romanticism of her sisters, and it shows clearly here. Agnes's life is more or less a continuous stream of minor hardships, the willful and unthinking cruelties of the upper classes upon their servants. They are petty things but great in number and deeply felt. Perhaps we all suppose our lives are epic tales, for Agnes certainly seems to think she feels more deeply than the rest of the species. Again writing semi-autobiographically, Anne Bronte was a governess and used her experiences with pupils, although I cannot comment on any romantic hopes or experiences she may have had on the job.

Agnes is more pathetic than sympathetic. She is passive, devoid of agency and barely daring to speak. She waits for the story to happen to her. She laments her misfortunes while explicitly trying to keep a stiff upper lip. She writes poor poetry. She alludes to having greater depths that she never demonstrates, including one overwrought paragraph where she explains that she could expound her wisdom in matters of the heart except she would not want to risk the boredom and ridicule of an audience that was not up to understanding her. Hmm, this might play well to an audience of love-struck teenage lasses who no one understands.

I could support reading the chapters of her first position, just to see the depiction of the teacher disarmed and then punished for trying to do her job. Delinquents below, enablers above. Agnes says she is trying to inform other governesses, and the depiction is still useful to parents, teachers, etc. Other than that, meh.

On a note of "the past is another country," Agnes starts looking for work because her family is reduced to such poverty that they have only one servant. Yeah. Perhaps the lot of the lower-class servants was less anguished because they did not expect decent treatment, while Agnes suffers from the mismatch.

Amazon link
Free text at Project Gutenberg

Monday, December 21, 2009

Kith by Holly Black and Ted Naifeh

The Good Neighbors, book 2

Rating - 3: worth reading once (borrow it from a library)

Low investment, low pay-off, this book marginally clears the bar for "worth it" without making me enthusiastic about the next one the way the first one did.

Rue returns, half-human and half-faerie, with her mother's faerie kin planning something against the human world. Her friends have gone weird and the world threatens to go crazy. She enters the faerie world in search of answers and her mother.

The graphic novel art remains good, although everyone looks a bit feline. If you like pointed ears and claws, this has a lot of them. A couple of the faces could use more differentiation. The story is not much for big spectacles, just character scenes with lots and lots of shadow. Faerie parties are a bit of a spectacle, but that is just a bit more decoration on the humans who already look half-way there.

Characterization is minimal. Bring whatever character affinities you liked from the first book, because each minor character gets just a couple pages in the spotlight. Most of them are broken or breaking in their own personal ways. Everyone's life is problematic, it seems, but I am not given much reason to care about their suffering.

The plot seems mostly to be Rue having culture shock with respect to the faerie world. The lines from before nudge forward, but after mixing in a few new threads, there is not much room to progress. There is a central theme, Aubrey's plot against the city, but that stays surprisingly in the background considering it is the plot driver. The elements of it are in the foreground, but it is as if the book needs to remind us every now and again that there is a unifying theme to these separate scenes.

If I may make a recommendation to both sides of the fight, without spoiling things? When you demonstrably have the means to reverse necessary parts of the enemy's plans, even if you later find that it causes some negative side effects, it could be worth it to do so. And if you are that enemy? It is okay to go a little overboard in case of reversal, or at least bring more sacrificial knives to the big climax when the hero can undo your sacrifices.

It is a dark book about faeries, mixing in more woods and a bit less of the city this time. I missed Birch, a minor character I liked who had four pages this time. Most of the rest of the minor cast left me cold. Obvious potential love interest began working on that potential. It ends surprisingly. Kind of "meh," although I give credit for an ending that highlights possible character depths only suggested before.

Amazon link

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Skeleton Crew by Stephen King

Rating - 3: worth reading once (borrow it from a library)

I have decided that going through an entire book of them is the wrong way to enjoy short stories. Just in terms of the reading process, there are too many stopping points, hard breaks where giving a story the proper matting makes the book take a very long time. More importantly, it is like taking one scoop of everything from a buffet and then eating spoonfuls blindfolded: lots of different flavors at random, with only a guess when the change is coming. King's metaphor for a short story is a kiss in the dark from a stranger; you can decide for yourself whether you would want to kiss a series of unknown strangers, once each, unseen before or after.

This is a collection of short stories from Stephen King, published between 1968 and 1983. Stephen King, you may know, mostly writes horror stories.

I might have gone with a 2.5, since I can recommend only about 60% of the book, and as they are short stories, the various parts are severable. I will rule, however, that personal taste may play a part in which ones you enjoy, so find your own 60%. I would advise that, if a story does not seem appealing at the beginning, it will probably not be appealing by the end. They are internally consistent, rather than having great swings in quality. I will talk about the ones I would recommend.

The first recommendation must be "The Raft." This is a great story, doing in 30 pages what The Ruins did in 600. It is the same core story, with even some of the same details, only on a raft instead of in ruins. It has 95+% of the good from The Ruins and none of the bad. On our value per unit time scale, this is Stargirl quality or better. Successful short stories are like that.

"The Raft" and "The Mist" share with The Ruins a good approach to character introduction. Set up several characters and relationships before the problems happen. Build in some conflicts, then throw something overwhelming at them to see who overcomes and what shatters. (These being that kind of story, there is more shattering.) It is important to want our characters to succeed or suffer, and it certainly does not work when we are supposed to root for the survival of unlikeable characters (I'm looking at you, "Ruins" movie).

"The Raft," "The Mist," and "Word Processor of the Gods" also succeed where others fail by not trying to explain it. You have an unimaginable horror, just run with it. "The Mist" takes a few guesses at what might have happened out there, but ultimately never tries to resolve it and bring logic to the insanity. If you try to establish internal logic, you are responsible for making it good and thinking through the implications. Doing that well boosts the quality significantly, but doing it badly can drop it further. Mr. King declines to explain, and that works.

"The Jaunt" is mostly explaining, and it works. Seriously, almost the entire story is exposition, building up to a big finish. The strength of the underlying concept and the quote at the end were what made me read the book. High Octane Nightmare Fuel indeed.

Another way in which Mr. King succeeds is in having nothing to explain. Some people are insane or evil. Let them loose and see what happens. He might play with mysterious questions, as in "Nona," but "Cain Rose Up" is just a straightforward story with one dangerous person. "Cain Rose Up" competes strongly with "The Raft" in value per page, a 7-page story with good foreshadowing that delivers strongly at its climax. "The Raft" still wins, because its 30 pages allow for a more satisfying whole, but this is a great brief kiss.

Mr. King does not always succeed in mixing the banal and the surreal. That will include several stories not worth mentioning, such as the two milkman stories that fail where "Cain Rose Up" succeeded. "Mrs. Todd's Shortcut" does add the surreal successfully, a non-horror story that dips slowly dips into the fantastic. It is not the best story in the collection, but it builds up slowly and delivers the appropriate conclusion. Twice as long, "The Ballad of the Flexible Bullet" also does a great job of mixing banality, insanity (alcoholism in this case), and an uncertain dose of magic. Mr. King has a way with somewhat unreliable narrators.

Continuing the non-horror trend (the random spoonfuls on the buffet), "Word Processor of the Gods" is on the edge of horror. Things can go very badly when you play with the monkey's paw. Tipping entirely out of horror and magic, "The Wedding Gig" is the last story I will recommend. I kept expecting the magic and horror, but no, this is an entirely straightforward story involving unfortunate events. It is low key but effective, not as high-reaching as the other stories but successful within its reach.

I notice that I keep using the words "success" and "delivers" in this review. It is the clearest way I have of describing Stephen King's writing style when it works. I have a long list of 2's that are not worth reading because the author tried something he could not pull off. Stephen King writes effectively, delivering on his premises and seeing them through with sufficient thoughtfulness and well-structured storytelling. Some of these stories are very good. Several of the stories that I recommend above, I would not recommend picking up the book just for them, but if you are there, they do everything the author asks them to. That is our other judging criterion: not asking the book to be something else, but seeing whether it succeeds on its own terms. Stephen King is the archetypal novelist of his genre in our time, and he owns his space well.

Amazon link